#STEAM FNAF 4 HALLOWEEN UPDATE SERIES#

If you turned your back on the series after or during the second game, you should definitely turn back around and give Five Nights at Freddy's 3 a shot. But ultimately more questions arose than answers. The minigames were a really nice addition. Now, don't get me wrong: The way hints were handled in the second game was done well. We got bits and pieces in Freddy's 2, enough for most fans to determine either Foxy or Mangle did the bite of '87 and to come to the conclusion that a security guard had murdered the children. Through the first two games, the community wanted to know who killed the children, which bot did the bite of '87, and what was making the bots try to kill the buildings' security guards. You know it, I know it, and Scott probably knows it too. It's pretty spooky, sure - but without all the theorycrafting about the bots, the Freddy's games would have far less play mileage. The lore, after all, is what's kept people so interested in the series. The lore in Freddy's 1 and 2Д«efore I go into the third game, I do want to touch on the lore up through the first two. If I could forget the second game (sans Mangle and the Marionette), I would. It was an interesting experiment on Scott's part, but ultimately the game fell on its face. The game itself was lacking in comparison to the first.ДЇreddy's 2 lacked the subtle little things that made picking apart the first game great - and it didn't help that you spent most of your time winding up the music box. We fast forward to the release of Five Nights at Freddy's 2, which was highly anticipated by fans both to see where Scott would take the game and what lore hints it might have held.

It really came out of left field and I would even go so far to say it was mysterious. The first Five Nights at Freddy's was great because it came from a developer no one knew, the gameplay itself was unique, and there was just enough of a sprinkling of lore hints around the game.

Steam fnaf 4 halloween update